FrançaisIs Barrington Research a reliable analyst?
Which sectors is it reliable in?
| Sector | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 61.1% | +67% | 18 |
| Industrials | 47.1% | +16% | 34 |
| Health Care | 5.3% | -1% | 19 |
Its best calls (by stock)
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) | 61.1% | +67% | 18 |
| Snap-on (SNA) | 48% | +15% | 25 |
| Henry Schein (HSIC) | 6.7% | +2% | 15 |
← See the full analyst leaderboard
Frequently asked questions
Is Barrington Research a reliable analyst?
In short — Over 1 year, 41.6% of Barrington Research's targets turned out profitable, for an average gain of +26% per call (i.e. +10% vs its sector), across 77 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: unreliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
Which sectors is Barrington Research best at?
Ses secteurs les plus fiables : Communication Services (61.1% profitables, +67% / call), Industrials (47.1% profitables, +16% / call), Health Care (5.3% profitables, -1% / call).
How many of Barrington Research's calls are analyzed?
77 timestamped Barrington Research targets were replayed against real prices over 1 year — the basis for the 41.6% profitable-calls figure.
What is JPI Invest?
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best — on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
- 🏆 Analyst leaderboard by real reliability (beating their sector, not just riding the rally)
- 🎯 What to buy: 3 backtested methods over 6 years, from cautious to aggressive
- 💬 AI assistant: ask anything about any stock, with the numbers
- 📊 Portfolio tracking + 🔔 price alerts by email
⚠️ Educational, not advice. « Reliability » = past targets replayed against real prices (point-in-time). Past performance does not predict the future.