FranΓ§ais| Year | π’ Light | π― Fair | β‘ Risk+ | S&P 500 | Top pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | β | +56% | +54% | +16% | WDC +282% |
| 2024 | β | +5% | +18% | +23% | UAL +135% |
| 2023 | β | +48% | +46% | +24% | NVDA +239% |
| 2022 | β | -13% | -8% | -20% | OXY +117% |
| 2021 | β | +26% | +24% | +27% | WFC +59% |
| 2020 | β | +10% | +11% | +16% | PYPL +116% |
| 2019 | β | +31% | +38% | +29% | TGT +94% |
| 2018 | β | -10% | -11% | -6% | BSX +43% |
| 2017 | β | +26% | +32% | +19% | VRTX +103% |
| 2016 | β | +16% | +24% | +10% | OKE +133% |
| 2015 | β | +5% | -9% | -1% | NFLX +134% |
π See the full 11-year backtest β
Yes: for each year since 2015 we show the 20 stocks the JPI Fair method would have picked on Jan 1 (using only prior info), and their real 12-month return. Click a year in the table.
No. Over 11 years it beat the S&P 500 7 times. Some years are negative (2018, 2022). It's lumpy β the edge shows over time, not every year.
On the Backtests page: the JPI Fair method returned +26%/yr over 11 years (2015-2025) vs +12.6% for the S&P 500, with the per-method detail and risk/return ratio.
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best β on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
Explore JPI Invest for free β How it works: the method β
β οΈ Educational, not advice. Point-in-time backtest, survivorship bias. Past performance β future.