FrançaisIs Compass Point a reliable analyst?
Which sectors is it reliable in?
| Sector | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 47.1% | +16% | 70 |
| Consumer Discretionary | 20% | +8% | 10 |
| Real Estate | 40% | +0% | 15 |
Its best calls (by stock)
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase (COIN) | 66.7% | +69% | 6 |
| Truist Financial (TFC) | 40% | +31% | 5 |
| PNC Financial Services (PNC) | 33.3% | +15% | 6 |
| Kimco Realty (KIM) | 60% | -12% | 5 |
← See the full analyst leaderboard
Frequently asked questions
Is Compass Point a reliable analyst?
In short — Over 1 year, 43.8% of Compass Point's targets turned out profitable, for an average gain of +15% per call (i.e. +0% vs its sector), across 105 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: unreliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
Which sectors is Compass Point best at?
Ses secteurs les plus fiables : Financials (47.1% profitables, +16% / call), Consumer Discretionary (20% profitables, +8% / call), Real Estate (40% profitables, +0% / call).
How many of Compass Point's calls are analyzed?
105 timestamped Compass Point targets were replayed against real prices over 1 year — the basis for the 43.8% profitable-calls figure.
What is JPI Invest?
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best — on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
- 🏆 Analyst leaderboard by real reliability (beating their sector, not just riding the rally)
- 🎯 What to buy: 3 backtested methods over 6 years, from cautious to aggressive
- 💬 AI assistant: ask anything about any stock, with the numbers
- 📊 Portfolio tracking + 🔔 price alerts by email
⚠️ Educational, not advice. « Reliability » = past targets replayed against real prices (point-in-time). Past performance does not predict the future.