FranΓ§ais| Metric | Intel | Nvidia | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $92.09 | $228 | |
| Median target (12m) | $110 (+19%) | $322 (+41%) | |
| Analyst reliability (1y) | 23% | 88% | π΅ NVDA |
| Avg gain / call (1y) | -8% | +88% | |
| P/E | β | 32.2 | π΅ NVDA |
| $1000 invested (10y ago) | $4,719 | $242,828 | π΅ NVDA |
| Year | INTC | NVDA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +206% | +7% | π’ INTC |
| 2025 | +92% | +39% | π’ INTC |
| 2024 | -45% | +171% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2023 | +73% | +239% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2022 | -48% | -50% | π’ INTC |
| 2021 | -22% | +125% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2020 | +9% | +122% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2019 | +5% | +76% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2018 | +7% | -31% | π’ INTC |
| 2017 | +36% | +81% | π΅ NVDA |
| 2016 | +22% | +224% | π΅ NVDA |
Over ~10 years, Intel returned $4,719 on $1000 vs $242,828 for Nvidia, and Nvidia has better analyst reliability. Not advice: also check valuation (P/E) and your horizon.
Over ~10 years, Nvidia wins ($4,719 vs $242,828 on $1000 invested, price return excluding dividends).
On P/E, Nvidia is cheaper (β vs 32.2). A lower P/E isn't always a better deal (growth matters).
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best β on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
Explore JPI Invest for free β How it works: the method β
β οΈ Educational information, not investment advice. Past price performance (excluding dividends). Data: Yahoo Finance.