FranΓ§ais| Metric | Lululemon Athletica | Nike, Inc. | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $115 | $38.44 | |
| Median target (12m) | $130 (+13%) | $47.00 (+22%) | |
| Analyst reliability (1y) | 38% | 30% | π’ LULU |
| Avg gain / call (1y) | +6% | +2% | |
| P/E | 9.4 | 18.4 | π’ LULU |
| $1000 invested (10y ago) | $2,176 | $667 | π’ LULU |
| Year | LULU | NKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -45% | -34% | π΅ NKE |
| 2025 | -46% | -22% | π΅ NKE |
| 2024 | -25% | -24% | π΅ NKE |
| 2023 | +60% | -13% | π’ LULU |
| 2022 | -18% | -13% | π΅ NKE |
| 2021 | +12% | +1% | π’ LULU |
| 2020 | +50% | +51% | π΅ NKE |
| 2019 | +91% | +4% | π’ LULU |
| 2018 | +55% | +28% | π’ LULU |
| 2017 | +21% | +17% | π’ LULU |
| 2016 | +24% | -7% | π’ LULU |
Over ~10 years, Lululemon Athletica returned $2,176 on $1000 vs $667 for Nike, Inc., and Lululemon Athletica has better analyst reliability. Not advice: also check valuation (P/E) and your horizon.
Over ~10 years, Lululemon Athletica wins ($2,176 vs $667 on $1000 invested, price return excluding dividends).
On P/E, Lululemon Athletica is cheaper (9.4 vs 18.4). A lower P/E isn't always a better deal (growth matters).
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best β on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
Explore JPI Invest for free β How it works: the method β
β οΈ Educational information, not investment advice. Past price performance (excluding dividends). Data: Yahoo Finance.