FranΓ§ais| Metric | Nvidia | Qualcomm | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $228 | $165 | |
| Median target (12m) | $322 (+41%) | $175 (+6%) | |
| Analyst reliability (1y) | 88% | 35% | π’ NVDA |
| Avg gain / call (1y) | +88% | +9% | |
| P/E | 32.2 | 18.9 | π΅ QCOM |
| $1000 invested (10y ago) | $242,828 | $3,697 | π’ NVDA |
| Year | NVDA | QCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +7% | +8% | π΅ QCOM |
| 2025 | +39% | +11% | π’ NVDA |
| 2024 | +171% | +6% | π’ NVDA |
| 2023 | +239% | +32% | π’ NVDA |
| 2022 | -50% | -40% | π΅ QCOM |
| 2021 | +125% | +20% | π’ NVDA |
| 2020 | +122% | +73% | π’ NVDA |
| 2019 | +76% | +55% | π’ NVDA |
| 2018 | -31% | -11% | π΅ QCOM |
| 2017 | +81% | -2% | π’ NVDA |
| 2016 | +224% | +30% | π’ NVDA |
Over ~10 years, Nvidia returned $242,828 on $1000 vs $3,697 for Qualcomm, and Nvidia has better analyst reliability. Not advice: also check valuation (P/E) and your horizon.
Over ~10 years, Nvidia wins ($242,828 vs $3,697 on $1000 invested, price return excluding dividends).
On P/E, Qualcomm is cheaper (32.2 vs 18.9). A lower P/E isn't always a better deal (growth matters).
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best β on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
Explore JPI Invest for free β How it works: the method β
β οΈ Educational information, not investment advice. Past price performance (excluding dividends). Data: Yahoo Finance.