FrançaisIs Keefe, Bruyette & Woods a reliable analyst?
Which sectors is it reliable in?
| Sector | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 44% | +12% | 491 |
| Consumer Discretionary | 27.3% | +7% | 22 |
| Real Estate | 12.5% | -18% | 8 |
Its best calls (by stock)
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKR & Co. (KKR) | 56.2% | +32% | 16 |
| Goldman Sachs (GS) | 55.6% | +26% | 9 |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 70% | +22% | 10 |
| Hartford (The) (HIG) | 71.4% | +20% | 14 |
| KeyCorp (KEY) | 63.6% | +20% | 11 |
| Bank of America (BAC) | 45.5% | +18% | 11 |
| Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) | 71.4% | +18% | 14 |
| Allstate (ALL) | 56.5% | +17% | 23 |
Its weakest calls
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNC Financial Services (PNC) | 0% | -12% | 9 |
| Progressive Corporation (PGR) | 8.3% | -3% | 12 |
| Franklin Resources (BEN) | 20% | -2% | 10 |
| State Street Corporation (STT) | 30% | -0% | 10 |
| Global Payments (GPN) | 27.3% | -0% | 11 |
← See the full analyst leaderboard
Frequently asked questions
Is Keefe, Bruyette & Woods a reliable analyst?
In short — Over 1 year, 42.4% of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods's targets turned out profitable, for an average gain of +10% per call (i.e. +0% vs its sector), across 528 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: unreliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
Which sectors is Keefe, Bruyette & Woods best at?
Ses secteurs les plus fiables : Financials (44% profitables, +12% / call), Consumer Discretionary (27.3% profitables, +7% / call), Real Estate (12.5% profitables, -18% / call).
How many of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods's calls are analyzed?
528 timestamped Keefe, Bruyette & Woods targets were replayed against real prices over 1 year — the basis for the 42.4% profitable-calls figure.
What is JPI Invest?
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best — on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
- 🏆 Analyst leaderboard by real reliability (beating their sector, not just riding the rally)
- 🎯 What to buy: 3 backtested methods over 6 years, from cautious to aggressive
- 💬 AI assistant: ask anything about any stock, with the numbers
- 📊 Portfolio tracking + 🔔 price alerts by email
⚠️ Educational, not advice. « Reliability » = past targets replayed against real prices (point-in-time). Past performance does not predict the future.