FranΓ§ais| Metric | Apple Inc. | Microsoft | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $349 | $530 | |
| Median target (12m) | $350 (+0%) | $625 (+18%) | |
| Analyst reliability (1y) | 62% | 60% | π’ AAPL |
| Avg gain / call (1y) | +28% | +20% | |
| P/E | 40.0 | 29.5 | π΅ MSFT |
| $1000 invested (10y ago) | $11,971 | $7,331 | π’ AAPL |
| Year | AAPL | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +10% | -5% | π’ AAPL |
| 2025 | +9% | -1% | π’ AAPL |
| 2024 | +34% | -4% | π’ AAPL |
| 2023 | +23% | +66% | π΅ MSFT |
| 2022 | -11% | -17% | π’ AAPL |
| 2021 | +36% | +29% | π’ AAPL |
| 2020 | +77% | +43% | π’ AAPL |
| 2019 | +58% | +45% | π’ AAPL |
| 2018 | -3% | +19% | π΅ MSFT |
| 2017 | +30% | +47% | π΅ MSFT |
| 2016 | +42% | +26% | π’ AAPL |
Over ~10 years, Apple Inc. returned $11,971 on $1000 vs $7,331 for Microsoft, and Apple Inc. has better analyst reliability. Not advice: also check valuation (P/E) and your horizon.
Over ~10 years, Apple Inc. wins ($11,971 vs $7,331 on $1000 invested, price return excluding dividends).
On P/E, Microsoft is cheaper (40.0 vs 29.5). A lower P/E isn't always a better deal (growth matters).
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best β on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
Explore JPI Invest for free β How it works: the method β
β οΈ Educational information, not investment advice. Past price performance (excluding dividends). Data: Yahoo Finance.