FrançaisIs Mizuho a reliable analyst?
Which sectors is it reliable in?
| Sector | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 66% | +43% | 53 |
| Information Technology | 53% | +36% | 625 |
| Industrials | 44.9% | +19% | 127 |
| Energy | 41.5% | +13% | 207 |
| Consumer Discretionary | 37.9% | +12% | 153 |
| Health Care | 40.8% | +12% | 228 |
Its best calls (by stock)
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology (MU) | 50% | +98% | 36 |
| Nvidia (NVDA) | 90% | +87% | 40 |
| Lam Research (LRCX) | 74.1% | +79% | 27 |
| Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) | 70.6% | +74% | 34 |
| Applied Materials (AMAT) | 76% | +70% | 25 |
| Western Digital (WDC) | 39.1% | +62% | 23 |
| Broadcom (AVGO) | 71.9% | +39% | 32 |
| ON Semiconductor (ON) | 52.2% | +33% | 23 |
Its weakest calls
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| APA Corporation (APA) | 40% | -9% | 20 |
| Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) | 23.8% | -4% | 21 |
| Devon Energy (DVN) | 18.2% | -2% | 22 |
| DTE Energy (DTE) | 5% | +0% | 20 |
| Salesforce (CRM) | 39.4% | +7% | 33 |
← See the full analyst leaderboard
Frequently asked questions
Is Mizuho a reliable analyst?
In short — Over 1 year, 40.8% of Mizuho's targets turned out profitable, for an average gain of +17% per call (i.e. +5% vs its sector), across 1972 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: unreliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
Which sectors is Mizuho best at?
Ses secteurs les plus fiables : Communication Services (66% profitables, +43% / call), Information Technology (53% profitables, +36% / call), Industrials (44.9% profitables, +19% / call).
How many of Mizuho's calls are analyzed?
1972 timestamped Mizuho targets were replayed against real prices over 1 year — the basis for the 40.8% profitable-calls figure.
What is JPI Invest?
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best — on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
- 🏆 Analyst leaderboard by real reliability (beating their sector, not just riding the rally)
- 🎯 What to buy: 3 backtested methods over 6 years, from cautious to aggressive
- 💬 AI assistant: ask anything about any stock, with the numbers
- 📊 Portfolio tracking + 🔔 price alerts by email
⚠️ Educational, not advice. « Reliability » = past targets replayed against real prices (point-in-time). Past performance does not predict the future.