FrançaisIs Guggenheim a reliable analyst?
Which sectors is it reliable in?
| Sector | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 73.1% | +48% | 26 |
| Communication Services | 58.1% | +29% | 86 |
| Financials | 51.1% | +19% | 45 |
| Health Care | 43.3% | +13% | 97 |
| Utilities | 37.2% | +12% | 94 |
| Consumer Staples | 39.2% | +12% | 74 |
Its best calls (by stock)
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Platforms (META) | 100% | +91% | 9 |
| Netflix (NFLX) | 82.4% | +43% | 17 |
| ServiceNow (NOW) | 92.3% | +41% | 13 |
| Lilly (Eli) (LLY) | 77.8% | +40% | 9 |
| Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) | 60% | +39% | 15 |
| First Solar (FSLR) | 60% | +32% | 10 |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 63.6% | +26% | 11 |
| Walmart (WMT) | 66.7% | +24% | 15 |
Its weakest calls
| Stock | Profitable calls | Avg gain / call | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 8% | -31% | 25 |
| Workday, Inc. (WDAY) | 0% | -25% | 8 |
| Palo Alto Networks (PANW) | 33.3% | -14% | 9 |
| Aptiv (APTV) | 18.2% | -5% | 11 |
| Walt Disney Company (The) (DIS) | 27.3% | -4% | 11 |
← See the full analyst leaderboard
Frequently asked questions
Is Guggenheim a reliable analyst?
In short — Over 1 year, 43.0% of Guggenheim's targets turned out profitable, for an average gain of +14% per call (i.e. +4% vs its sector), across 698 timestamped calls replayed against real prices. JPI verdict: unreliable on average. An analyst can be good in one sector and poor in another — details below.
Which sectors is Guggenheim best at?
Ses secteurs les plus fiables : Industrials (73.1% profitables, +48% / call), Communication Services (58.1% profitables, +29% / call), Financials (51.1% profitables, +19% / call).
How many of Guggenheim's calls are analyzed?
698 timestamped Guggenheim targets were replayed against real prices over 1 year — the basis for the 43.0% profitable-calls figure.
What is JPI Invest?
JPI Invest aggregates analyst recommendations across the entire S&P 500 (plus the S&P MidCap 400), replays them against real prices and measures who predicts best — on results, not reputation. Instead of taking a price target at face value, you see each analyst's track record on each stock.
- 🏆 Analyst leaderboard by real reliability (beating their sector, not just riding the rally)
- 🎯 What to buy: 3 backtested methods over 6 years, from cautious to aggressive
- 💬 AI assistant: ask anything about any stock, with the numbers
- 📊 Portfolio tracking + 🔔 price alerts by email
⚠️ Educational, not advice. « Reliability » = past targets replayed against real prices (point-in-time). Past performance does not predict the future.